翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Georgia Tech–Tulane football rivalry ・ Georgia Tech–Virginia Tech football rivalry ・ Georgia Teen Republicans ・ Georgia Theatre ・ Georgia Thompson ・ Georgia Today ・ Georgia Township Act ・ Georgia Train and Equip Program ・ Georgia Trust for Historic Preservation ・ Georgia Turner ・ Georgia Tzanaki ・ Georgia v. Ashcroft ・ Georgia v. Brailsford ・ Georgia v. Brailsford (1792) ・ Georgia v. Brailsford (1793) ・ Georgia v. Brailsford (1794) ・ Georgia v. McCollum ・ Georgia v. Randolph ・ Georgia v. Smith ・ Georgia v. South Carolina (1990) ・ Georgia v. Stanton ・ Georgia van Cuylenburg ・ Georgia van der Rohe ・ Georgia Veterans State Park ・ Georgia Viaduct ・ Georgia Warnke ・ Georgia Warriors ・ Georgia Wettlin Larsen ・ Georgia White ・ Georgia Williams Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Georgia v. Brailsford (1794) ： ウィキペディア英語版 Georgia v. Brailsford (1794) ''Georgia v. Brailsford'', , was an early United States Supreme Court case where the presiding judge of the Court instructed the jury, in part, that a jury has a right to judge the law as well as the facts. This case is often cited as precedent by proponents of jury nullification.〔James R. Perry, ''The Documentary History of the Supreme Court of the United States, 1789-1800'', Volume 6, "Georgia v. Brailsford," p. 73. ()〕 One scholar has argued that the jury the Supreme Court used in this case was a special jury of merchants of the type used by Lord Mansfield.〔Lochlan F. Shelfer, ''Special Juries in the Supreme Court'', 123 Yale. L.J. 208 (2013). ()〕 ==Summary== In this case, the first Chief Justice, John Jay, wrote: "It is presumed, that juries are the best judges of facts; it is, on the other hand, presumed that courts are the best judges of law. But still both objects are within your power of decision… you () have a right to take it upon yourselves to judge both, and ''to determine the law as well as the fact in controversy''". In 1895 in ''Sparf v. United States'', the Court said that courts need not inform jurors of their ''de facto'' right of juror nullification although jurors' inherent right to judge the law remains unchallenged. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Georgia v. Brailsford (1794)」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.